We know that this exists in apostasia cases, in mixing couples, but to the light of I Color. 7:15, and not in ' ' parektos' ' in itself. The divorce alone can be legitimated in case of adultery, or cases of mixing marriages, and, exactly thus, if the part skeptic to demand, as I Color. 7:15, that we will see more ahead. Please visit Alchemy if you seek more information. These are the exceptions.
Jesus said that the divorce exists because of the pecaminosidade of the sort of the man, and not because of the adultery one, ' ' because of the hardness of your heart he is that Moiss allowed you to repudiate your women; however, he was not thus since princpio' ' (Mt.19: 8). Mateus 19:3 – 12: v.3? ' ' It had come (the Jesus) some fariseus, they tried and it, asked: It is I bid on the husband to repudiate the woman by any reason? v. 4? Then it answered: ' ' You do not tend read that the Creator since the principle made them man and woman, (v.5) and said: will leave the man father and mother, and will join itself its woman, becoming the two one alone meat? v.6? In way that already is not more two, however one only meat. Therefore, what God joined does not separate the man. v.7? They had talked back to it: ' ' Why it ordered Moiss to give divorce letter and to repudiate? v.8? Jesus answered to them: ' ' Because of the hardness of your heart he is that Moiss allowed you to repudiate your women; however, he was not thus since the principle.
V.9? I, say however you: Who to repudiate its woman, NOT BEING BECAUSE OF ILLICIT SEXUAL RELATIONS (CONJUGAL, ADULTERY INFIDELITY), and to marry the repudiated one commits adultery. v. 10? The disciples had said to it (in particular): ' ' If this is the condition of the relative man its woman (if to only divorce its woman in case of adultery), does not agree to marry.