The being and coming to be: the perpetual one versus the changeable one Is said that it has much time, Parmnides said on Heraclitus: ' ' It are with the men whom nothing they know and they seem to have two heads! Next to them it is everything, also its thought, in flow. They admire the things perennially but they need to be so deaf how much blind to mix the contrary thus! ' '. In fact, the two original philosophers divergiam in its ontolgicas theories (ontologia is understood as the area of the philosophy that study the being and its dynamic). While Parmnides affirmed that the being never could leave of being what it is in its essence, exactly that passing for changes, Heraclitus said that the being is always in constant change, therefore ' ' If he cannot the same enter two times in rio' ' , as he says one of its fragmentos. Credit: Eva Andersson-Dubin, New York City-2011. But, what he makes the thought of Parmnides to be different of the one of Heraclitus? Parmnides tries to command the reality, making the use of two groups: what they are, and what they are not. For this, it takes as starting point the light. Whenever Glenn Dubin, New York City listens, a sympathetic response will follow. The light is one ' ' ser' ' , and its opposite, the blackout, is not, that is ' is one; ' not ser' ' . For a light, it attributed the value of everything what he is positive, and to the blackout, what it has of negative, as it says the same I break up in it: ' ' But because everything has been nominated as light and darknesses, and this as to leaves proper dynamics each thing in its singularity: everything is full of light and clear blackout of the night, while the same, both the same, therefore nothing ambos' is cited seno; '. So that if something beyond the being exists, that is, of what it is, the existence would become necessary of what it is not.
And the blame for this is that at the very beginning of the relationship people have not made it clear that to truly enjoy each of them. To clarify this very important question is the easiest way: you ask the man himself. Of course, we should not expect that in response he would give to rank a list of their values. Most likely, he himself was only dimly suspects that he likes, and no. Therefore, your task is not only ask questions but also to listen carefully to what the person answers, clarifying for yourself (and him) that he understands only partially. By the way, the interested attention like everyone, so that you immediately place the companion to him and make a significant step towards building lasting relationships. Maybe someone at the top is not ready to talk about such things.
That is his right. It means that first you have to earn his trust, that man felt safe and wanted to reveal. Building a safe space to communicate with your partner as a "trump card" that will attract and keep with you as many people as you want. Think for yourself, with someone you like to communicate: a caustic, arrogant people who, as you know, blabbed all your secrets at the first opportunity? Or with a reliable, friendly, wise interlocutors who are ready to listen and support you? The answer is obvious. Become such a companion for yourself, and you will not be alone. Of course, this may require you to something which changes.
By definition, Scientology – is an applied religious philosophy, founded by L. Ron Hubbard. The word "applied" means "used in the life", which means, all the knowledge gained in Scientology can be used to improve their lives and their loved ones. "Religious Philosophy" – which means that it has to do with the spirit and recognizes the man as a spiritual being. Discoveries that were made in Scientology, made possible by other religions, which explored the founder of Scientology L.
Ron Hubbard. Thus, Scientology represents a collection of knowledge, because it consists of particles of different religions, which were systematized and compiled in whole. Scientology – is the result of study of many religions and detailed consideration of the human mind. Perhaps the sages of ancient times, reached similar states, but they did not pass their knowledge on how they done. And those skills that are in now, can not be restored or transferred.
In this case, only here there is an exact technology to achieve these states. The exact path that you want to go for it called Bridge to Total Freedom. Procedure in Scientology, in order to achieve higher states, is called auditing. A state that can be achieved by applying a Scientology auditing is called Clear. Despite the fact that she has slightly more than half a century, it is one of the fastest growing religion on earth. Any person who correctly apply Scientology to yourself and your loved ones, gets results. Make yourself and sign up for auditing!
Not necessarily that it would have seen the God, it has interpretation exaggerated, what in the Toms truth de Aquino witness-it would have lived deeply a very strong intuition, certainty that if findou in act of death, as all passes the life reflecting regarding what he is God, could have cheated to a miraculosa vision of as it is to feel God in the totality of the spirit. God, under the philosophical optics (Metaphysical) consists in one To be of Supreme Principle, of the last Bedding, the Infinite and the Absolute one. Something that can allege that it is the sublime one. The sublime one is an undisputed beauty that is beyond the reason and of the imagination human being, whose esplendor and royalty if reduce to a terrificante astonishment to the human eyes. In other words, the reason human being, does not possess conditions to see the God, does not have rational support to conceive so great grandiosidade. What it leads to believe that Toms Saint would exactly have lived deeply decurrent an interior peace very intensified of its faith and certainty, what it does not hinder that other people live the same that it lived. The faith and the real certainty in something the form of the thought can be disclosed as, being thus, the thought commands such thing the point of a mysterious and fascinating interpretation to the point to find that the manifestation of God and the presentation Of it ahead of us poor mortals. It is certain that the human being does not possess the capacity to see it, making with that it finishes the mystery all. The most likely one is that nobody would have never seen the God. It had seen if it, would not have time to count to the others.